Convergence and Rain Absorption Failures
-
pfisterscott
- WUFI User

- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 8:48 am -1100
- Location: Colorado
Convergence and Rain Absorption Failures
Are calculations with convergence and rain absorption failures useful? Or must there be zero failures in both these categories to have useful results?
-
Manfred Kehrer
- WUFI International Support Team

- Posts: 351
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:17 am -1100
- Location: Northbrook, IL; USA
- Contact:
Re: Convergence and Rain Absorption Failures
Dear Mr.Pfisterscott,pfisterscott wrote:Are calculations with convergence and rain absorption failures useful? Or must there be zero failures in both these categories to have useful results?
the calculations can be useful. If have one ore more convergence errors, you should take a look to the balances. If they if don´t match you might have a useless results. Please refer also the the online help system (dialog:"status of last calculation")
Manfred
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.
Official WUFI® Collaboration Partner for USA/Canada
Enjoy WUFI®
.... It is easy and complex.
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.
Official WUFI® Collaboration Partner for USA/Canada
Enjoy WUFI®
-
Michael Hurd
- WUFI User

- Posts: 103
- Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:27 am -1100
Convergence failure follow up
When checking the water balances due to the presence of excess convergence failures, is there an guide line for how much difference these balances can/should have before becoming concerned about the validity of the results?
Also, I have noticed that when modeling the air space created by a 6" steel stud I have to use 3 layers of air to approximate the 6" air space - the multiple air layers seems to create an increase in covergence failures as well as widening the gap of the water balances - is this to be expected? Should I model the 6" air space as the largest air space available in the program versus using multiple air layers to approximate the 6" of air?
Also, I have noticed that when modeling the air space created by a 6" steel stud I have to use 3 layers of air to approximate the 6" air space - the multiple air layers seems to create an increase in covergence failures as well as widening the gap of the water balances - is this to be expected? Should I model the 6" air space as the largest air space available in the program versus using multiple air layers to approximate the 6" of air?
Respectfully,
Michael Hurd
Michael Hurd