Dear Thomas,
Thanks again for your quick reply.
I think that this misunderstanding of the air infiltration model explains my the results. However, I am still wondering how to represent this risk.
If I understand your explanation correctly, if the position of the moisture source on the model is ...
Search found 3 matches
- Thu Feb 22, 2024 4:34 am -1100
- Forum: Hygrothermal Sources & Sinks
- Topic: Moisture source not considered
- Replies: 6
- Views: 190684
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 5:55 am -1100
- Forum: Hygrothermal Sources & Sinks
- Topic: Moisture source not considered
- Replies: 6
- Views: 190684
Re: Moisture source not considered
Hello Thomas,
Thanks for your answer.
Here are some precisions on my input :
- IBP air infiltration model
- q50 = 5 m3/(m2.h) (Classe C)
- free water saturation
- stack height = 5m
- overpressure parameter = 0 Pa
Could I have placed my source at a wrong place ?
Regards,
Benoît
Thanks for your answer.
Here are some precisions on my input :
- IBP air infiltration model
- q50 = 5 m3/(m2.h) (Classe C)
- free water saturation
- stack height = 5m
- overpressure parameter = 0 Pa
Could I have placed my source at a wrong place ?
Regards,
Benoît
- Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:51 am -1100
- Forum: Hygrothermal Sources & Sinks
- Topic: Moisture source not considered
- Replies: 6
- Views: 190684
Moisture source not considered
Hello,
I’m a new worker on the humidity subject in walls, especially in rehabilitation, and I have an issue with the internal humidity source (internal convection).
Here is the situation: I am trying to estimate the risk of condensation in a wall surrounded with an internal insulation made of ...
I’m a new worker on the humidity subject in walls, especially in rehabilitation, and I have an issue with the internal humidity source (internal convection).
Here is the situation: I am trying to estimate the risk of condensation in a wall surrounded with an internal insulation made of ...